Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. KAUFFMAN JEWELRY CO., Defendant in Error, 1928 — 28 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. KAUFFMAN JEWELRY CO., Defendant in Error
28 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff In Error, v. KAUFFMAN JEWELRY CO., Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
September 17, 1928.
No. 8229.
Pierce Butler, Jr., Charles Bunn, and E. G. Vaughan, all of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff in error.
Harry A. Hageman, of St. Paul, Minn., for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed with prejudice, without costs to either party in this court, per stipulation of parties.