Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William T. Gillott, Jr., as Assignee, etc., Respondent, v. William F. Redlich et al., Appellants, 1889 — 117 N.Y. 629 · caselaw · US
General
William T. Gillott, Jr., as Assignee, etc., Respondent, v. William F. Redlich et al., Appellants
117 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William T. Gillott, Jr., as Assignee, etc., Respondent, v. William F. Redlich et al., Appellants.
(Argued October 14, 1889;
decided October 29, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court of the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 13, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.
J. Homer Hildreth for appellants.
Henry D. Hotchkiss for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.