Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES ex rel. Max MAIROVITZ, Relator-Appellant, v. Benjamin M. DAY, as Commissioner, etc., Respondent-Appellee, 1926 — 12 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES ex rel. Max MAIROVITZ, Relator-Appellant, v. Benjamin M. DAY, as Commissioner, etc., Respondent-Appellee
12 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES ex rel. Max MAIROVITZ, Relator-Appellant, v. Benjamin M. DAY, as Commissioner, etc., Respondent-Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 17, 1926.)
No. 407.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Appeal from order discharging a writ of habeas corpus entered in the District Court for the Southern District of New York. ■
James C. Thomas, of New York City, for appellant. .
Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Nathan R. Margold, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), opposed.
Before HOUGH, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed, without thereby holding or intimating that application for release cannot be made later.