Tax
DIXON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
69 F.2d 461·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DIXON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 5028.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
March 15, 1934.
Rehearing Denied April 14, 1934.
Elwood G. Godman, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
Pat Malloy, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and John MaeC. Hudson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (Edward II. McDermott, Charles 0. Parker, and Marcus Whiting, all of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for respondent.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and FITZHENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The instant appeal presents fact and law questions so similar to Laflin v. Commissioner, 69 F.(2d) 460, this day decided by this court, that we deem it unnecessary to elaborate our reasons therein given for affirming the order of the Board of Tax Appeals. The decision in that ease is controlling.
The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.