Contracts · MBE-tested
Rowland v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
341 U.S. 923·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 380, Misc.
Rowland v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
W. Hayes Pettry for petitioner. C. W. Strickling for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia is denied for the reason that it does not appear from the record or from
the papers submitted that the judgment is final.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.