Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Casebeer v. Hudspeth, Warden, 1941 — 312 U.S. 662 · caselaw · US
General
Casebeer v. Hudspeth, Warden
312 U.S. 662·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 631.
Casebeer v. Hudspeth, Warden.
March 17, 1941.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is. granted, the petition for writ of certiorari is also granted, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals with directions to reconsider the petitioner’s appeal in the light of a transcript of the testimony taken at the hearing on the petition for habeas corpus.
Edward Casebeer, pro se.