Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NEW ENGLAND MOTOR RATE BUREAU, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1966 — 385 U.S. 203 · caselaw · US
Administrative
NEW ENGLAND MOTOR RATE BUREAU, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
385 U.S. 203·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NEW ENGLAND MOTOR RATE BUREAU, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 591.
Decided December 5, 1966.
Peter T. Beardsley, R. Edwin Brady, Bryce Rea, Jr., Guy H. Postell, John W. McFadden, Harry C. Ames, Roland Rice, Homer S. Carpenter, John 8. Fessenden and Richard R. Sigmon for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al.
William Q. Keenan for Railway Express Agency, Inc., and Arthur A. Arsham for National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., et al., intervenors below.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.