Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Baskin v. Industrial Accident Commission et al., 1949 — 338 U.S. 854 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Baskin v. Industrial Accident Commission et al.
338 U.S. 854·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 24, 1949.
Per Curiam Decisions.
No. 224.
Baskin v. Industrial Accident Commission et al.
Franklin C. Stark and Samuel B. Horovitz for petitioner. Everett A. Corten for the Industrial Accident Commission; and Oliver Dibble for the Kaiser Company et al., respondents.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of the cases in which judgments and orders were this day announced.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. It appears that the decision of this Court in Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moores, 335 U. S. 874, affirming the decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, 323 Mass. 162, 80 N. E. 2d 478, was not available to the District Court of Appeal at the time of its consideration of this cause. The judgment is vacated and the cause remanded to the District Court of Appeal for reconsideration in the light of Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moores, supra, and Davis v. Department of Labor, 317 U. S. 249. See Minnesota v. National Tea Co., 309 U. S. 551; State Tax Comm’n v. Van Cott, 306 U. S. 511.