Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Harrison A. Tucker et al., Appellants, v. Alexander McLean et al., Respondents, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 624 · caselaw · US
General
Harrison A. Tucker et al., Appellants, v. Alexander McLean et al., Respondents
142 N.Y. 624·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harrison A. Tucker et al., Appellants, v. Alexander McLean et al., Respondents.
(Submitted March 9, 1894 ;
decided April 10, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 12, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Charles M. Stafford for appellants.
Jaynes and Thomas H. Troy for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.