General
Lyman A. Stevens, Respondent, v. Marcellus Electric Railroad Company, Appellant, and Charles Garvey et al., Respondents
179 N.Y. 601·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lyman A. Stevens, Respondent, v. Marcellus Electric Railroad Company, Appellant, and Charles Garvey et al., Respondents.
Stevens v. Marcellus Electric B. B. Co., 94 App. Div. 609, appeal dismissed.
(Argued November 15, 1904;
decided November 29, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the ' fourth judicial department, entered April 11, 1904, which affirmed an order of Special Term requiring the defendants’ attorney to pay into court and return certain sums illegally collected by him.
3£. F. Dillon for appellant.
William, B. Crowley for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight and Werner, JJ. Taking no part: Bartlett and Vann, JJ.