General
Continental Casualty Co. v. United States for the Use and Benefit of Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.
393 U.S. 827·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 105.
Continental Casualty Co. v. United States for the Use and Benefit of Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.
Kahl K. Spriggs for petitioner.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.