General

Emma M. Stock and Others, Respondents, v. William Dunham Mann and Others, Respondents; Nathan Richman, Purchaser, Appellant

232 A.D. 709·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Emma M. Stock and Others, Respondents, v. William Dunham Mann and Others, Respondents. Nathan Richman, Purchaser, Appellant. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The effect of the decision of this court, as indicated by the opinion, was ,to relieve the purchaser from his bid, and the only purpose of the remittal to Special Term was for the correction of jurisdictional defects, for a resale, and for such further procedure in the action as may be necessary. All concur. Motion denied. See 229 App. Div. 19.— [Rep.