Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Morris, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of New York, Defendant in Error, 1879 — 77 N.Y. 621 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Morris, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of New York, Defendant in Error
77 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1879·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Morris, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of New York, Defendant in Error.
(Submitted May 19, 1879 ;
decided May 27, 1879.)
The only point presented for plaintiff in error was that the court erred in admitting evidence that he escaped from the jail while awaiting the action of the grand jury. An offer of such»evidence was made ; the court decided it admissible, and an exception was taken, but upon objection, that the commitment must be produced, which was sustained, no material evidence was given under the offer. Held, that-the decision could not have legally injured the prisoner; and that, therefore, the exception was not available.
James M. Hidgway for plaintiff in error.
Jerry A. Wemberg for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.