General
Feed W. Weitzel v. United States
253 U.S. 475·Supreme Court of the United States·1920
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 633.
Feed W. Weitzel v. United States.
Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Kentucky.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted May 3,1920.
Decided May 17,1920.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Pennsylvania Hospital v. Philadelphia, 245 U. S. 20, 24. (2) Lamar v. United States, 240 U. S, 60; Lamar v. United States, 241 U. S. 103.
Mr. A. E. Stricklett for plaintiff in error.
The Solicitor General for the United States.