Contracts · MBE-tested
Martinez v. Neelly, Successor to Jordan, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
344 U.S. 91697 L. Ed. 2d 707·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 218.
Martinez v. Neelly, Successor to Jordan, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Argued January 5, 1953.
Decided January 12, 1953.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Eugene Cotton argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cummings argued the cause for respondent.
With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Murray, Robert W. Ginnane, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kenneth C. Shelver.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.