Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Catherine FLYNN ex rel. CHEUNG GING HONG, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Anna C. M. TILLINGHAST, U. S. Commissioner of Immigration, Respondent, Appellee, 1929 — 34 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
General
Catherine FLYNN ex rel. CHEUNG GING HONG, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Anna C. M. TILLINGHAST, U. S. Commissioner of Immigration, Respondent, Appellee
34 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catherine FLYNN ex rel. CHEUNG GING HONG, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Anna C. M. TILLINGHAST, U. S. Commissioner of Immigration, Respondent, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
April 16, 1929.
No. 2330.
E. F. Damon and Walter Bates Farr, both of Boston, Mass., for appellant.
Frederick H. Tarr, U. S. Atty., and John W. Sehenek, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Boston, Mass., for appellee.
Before BINGHAM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order entered dismissing the appeal and affirming the decree of the District Court.