Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sloane et ux. v. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1969 — 393 U.S. 1093 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Sloane et ux. v. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
393 U.S. 1093·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 797.
Sloane et ux. v. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Paul E. Sloane, pro se, and for other petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley, and Alan S. Rosenthal for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Cer-tiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.