General
Hutto et al. v. Finney et al.; Rakas et al. v. Illinois; King v. Norris; Tracy, Judge v. Dixon et al.; Mosley v. United States Department of Labor et al.; Ford v. Muir, U. S. District Judge, et al.; Alderman v. Georgia; Rogers v. Douglas et ux.
439 U.S. 1122·Supreme Court of the United States·1979
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 76-1660.
No. 77-5781.
No. 78-173.
No. 78-513.
No. 78-5317.
No. 78-5388.
No. 78-5490.
No. 78-5582.
Hutto et al. v. Finney et al., Rakas et al. v. Illinois, King v. Norris, Tracy, Judge v. Dixon et al., Mosley v. United States Department of Labor et al., Ford v. Muir, U. S. District Judge, et al., Alderman v. Georgia, Rogers v. Douglas et ux.,
[MAJORITY]
437 U. S. 678;
ante, p. 128;
ante, p. 995;
ante, p. 983;
ante, p. 986;
ante, p. 978;
ante, p. 991; and
ante, p. 1058. Petitions for rehearing denied.