General

Joseph Hannigan, Respondent, v. The Union Warehouse Company, Appellant

153 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Joseph Hannigan, Respondent, v. The Union Warehouse Company, Appellant. Reported below, 3 App. Div. 618. (Argued April 19, 1897; decided May 4, 1897.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 15, 1896, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and- also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon the ground that there is no question in the record for review by the Court of Appeals. Dailey, Bell de Grane for motion. William Allen Butler and John Notman opposed. [MAJORITY] Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.