Contracts · MBE-tested
McNEILL, HOSPITAL SUPERINTENDENT, v. CARROLL
369 U.S. 149·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
McNEILL, HOSPITAL SUPERINTENDENT, v. CARROLL.
No. 513.
Decided March 19, 1962.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Isadore Siegal and Joseph J. Rose, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant.
Melvin L. Wulf for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Upon the suggestion of mootness submitted by counsel for the appellee by reason of the death of the appellee and of the appellant’s motion to vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, said judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause as moot.
Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.