Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The San Pedro.-Valverde, Claimant, 1818 — 16 U.S. 78 · caselaw · US
General
The San Pedro.-Valverde, Claimant
16 U.S. 783 Wheat. 78·Supreme Court of the United States·1818
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(Instance Court.)
The San Pedro.—Valverde, Claimant.
Decree of restitution affirmed, with a certificate of probable cause, in an instance cause, on farther proof.
This-cause was ordered to farther proof at the last term. Farther proof was produced at the present term and the cause submitted thereon without argument.
Feb. 7th.
Vide ante, vol. II. p. 9.
[MAJORITY — jyr- Chief Justice Marshall]
jyr- Chief Justice Marshall
delivered the opinion of the court, affirming the decree of restitution in the court below, with a certificate of probable cause of seizure.
Decree affirmed.