Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Proctor L. DOUGHERTY, Sidney Tallaferro, and William B. Ladue, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Gus Lee HOGAN, Appellee, 1930 — 45 F.2d 928 · caselaw · US
General
Proctor L. DOUGHERTY, Sidney Tallaferro, and William B. Ladue, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Gus Lee HOGAN, Appellee
45 F.2d 928·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1930
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and WHEAT, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Proctor L. DOUGHERTY, Sidney Tallaferro, and William B. Ladue, Commissioners of the District of Columbia, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Gus Lee HOGAN, Appellee.
No. 5177.
Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Argued Oct. 8, 1930.
Decided Dec. 1, 1930.
F. H. Stephens, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
W. Gwynn Gardiner, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and WHEAT, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
[MAJORITY — ROBB, Associate Justice.]
ROBB, Associate Justice.
This case (in which appellee on retirement in October, 1924, was awarded by appellants a pension of $50 per month) is ruled by our decision in Dougherty v. United States ex rel. Browning (No. 5176) 60 App. D. C. 8, 45 F.(2d) 926.
The judgment, therefore, should be modified so as to require the payment to appellee of a pension at the rate of $87.50 per month, commencing October 15, 1924, and continuing until July 1, 1930. As thus modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Affirmed, as modified.