Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Dissolution of the Simonds Furnace Company. Nason Manufacturing Company, Appellant; Lewis W. Raymond, as Receiver, Respondent, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 519 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Dissolution of the Simonds Furnace Company. Nason Manufacturing Company, Appellant; Lewis W. Raymond, as Receiver, Respondent
179 N.Y. 519·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Dissolution of the Simonds Furnace Company. Nason Manufacturing Company, Appellant; Lewis W. Raymond, as Receiver, Respondent.
Matter of Simonds Furnace Go., 88 App. Div. 614, affirmed.
(Argued May 31, 1904;
decided June 14, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 21, 1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term settling the accounts of the receiver herein.
Charles JDe Hart Brower for appellant.
Harry 8. Sleioher for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen aiid Werner, JJ.