General
Hattie H. Farrell, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Arthur J. Horgan et al., Appellants
128 N.Y. 611·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hattie H. Farrell, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Arthur J. Horgan et al., Appellants.
(Argued June 10, 1891;
decided June 25, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Hew York, entered upon an order made May 4, 1891, which affirmed a j udgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Edward W. S. Johnston for appellants.
Charles Steckler for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.