Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Ingram, 1917 — 244 U.S. 647 · caselaw · US
General
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Ingram
244 U.S. 647·Supreme Court of the United States·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 601.
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Ingram.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas.
Motion to dismiss or affirm or place on the summary docket submitted May 21, 1917.
Decided June 4, 1917.
Mr. Troy Pace for plaintiff in error.
Mr. J. H. Ralston and Mr. William E. Richardson for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.