Corporations
In the Matter of S. William Briscoe, Appellant, v. William F. Baker et al., Constituting the Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Respondents
184 N.Y. 564·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of S. William Briscoe, Appellant, v. William F. Baker et al., Constituting the Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.
Matter of Briscoe v. Baker, 107 App. Div. 616, affirmed.
(Argued February 27, 1906;
decided March 13, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 13, 1905, which affirmed an- order of Special Term which denied the petitioner’s motion for an order directing the defendant civil service coin mission to permit an inspection of certain papers under their control.
John W. Weed for appellant.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and William B. Crowell of counsel), for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hisoook, JJ.