General

In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Mary H. Priestley, Respondent, v. Oscar Berg, Appellant

225 A.D. 755·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1928·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Mary H. Priestley, Respondent, v. Oscar Berg, Appellant. [MAJORITY] Motion to restrain enforcement of judgment granted provided that the costs awarded by this court on November 9, 1928, be paid within three days from the entry of the order herein; otherwise, motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seeger and Scudder, JJ.