Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Fowler, Appellant, v. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Respondent, 1893 — 139 N.Y. 641 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Fowler, Appellant, v. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Respondent
139 N.Y. 641·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Fowler, Appellant, v. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Respondent.
(Argued October 5, 1893 ;
decided October 24, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the 'Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon ■an order made March 18, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon an order dismissing the complaint on trial at Circuit.
Henry C. Willcox for appellant.
William Henry Arnoux for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
•Judgment affirmed.