General
Timothy J. Wiard, Respondent, v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company, Appellant
169 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Timothy J. Wiard, Respondent, v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company, Appellant.
Wiard v. Syracuse B. T. By. Co., 52 App. Div. 635 affirmed.
(Argued December'6, 1901;
decided January 14, 1902.)
Appeal'from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the • Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered ST une- 21,1900, affirming a judgment of the Onondaga County Court in. favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Charles E. Spencer for appellant.
Frank C. Sargent for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Jndgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.