Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSPORT CORP., 1961 — 367 U.S. 906 · caselaw · US
Tax
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSPORT CORP.
367 U.S. 906·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSPORT CORP.
No. 843.
Decided June 19, 1961.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Harry Baum and Joseph Kovner for petitioner.
Richard R. Teschner and Warren W. Browning for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded in light of American Automobile Association v. United States, ante, p. 687, and United States v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., 366 U. S. 380.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.