Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hoskins v. Moore, Warden; Sterba v. Illinois; Hudson v. Overholser; Burkholder v. United States; Taylor v. Squier, Warden; Middleton v. Michigan; Stephenson v. Page, Warden; Gibbs v. Bushong, Superintendent; Fleet v. Swenson, Warden; Van Beek v. Michigan; Stewart v. Steele, Warden; Lang v. Mayo, Custodian; Grier v. Warden, State Prison; Carroll v. Swenson, Warden; Horn v. Frisbie, Warden; and Hull v. Frisbie, Warden, 1950 — 340 U.S. 804 · caselaw · US
General
Hoskins v. Moore, Warden; Sterba v. Illinois; Hudson v. Overholser; Burkholder v. United States; Taylor v. Squier, Warden; Middleton v. Michigan; Stephenson v. Page, Warden; Gibbs v. Bushong, Superintendent; Fleet v. Swenson, Warden; Van Beek v. Michigan; Stewart v. Steele, Warden; Lang v. Mayo, Custodian; Grier v. Warden, State Prison; Carroll v. Swenson, Warden; Horn v. Frisbie, Warden; and Hull v. Frisbie, Warden
340 U.S. 804·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 2,
No. 4,
No. 10,
No. 21,
No. 28,
No. 33,
No. 43,
No. 80,
No. 82,
No. 84,
No. 91,
No. 92,
No. 102,
No. 112,
No. 129,
No. 149,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Hoskins v. Moore, Warden; Sterba v. Illinois; Hudson v. Overholser; Burkholder v. United States; Taylor v. Squier, Warden; Middleton v. Michigan; Stephenson v. Page, Warden; Gibbs v. Bushong, Superintendent; Fleet v. Swenson, Warden; Van Beek v. Michigan; Stewart v. Steele, Warden; Lang v. Mayo, Custodian; Grier v. Warden, State Prison; Carroll v. Swenson, Warden; Horn v. Frisbie, Warden; and Hull v. Frisbie, Warden.
Petitioners pro se. Solicitor General Perlman for respondent in No. 28, Mise. Price Daniel, Attorney General of Texas, Charles D. Mathews, First Assistant Attorney General, E. Jacobson and Calvin B. Garwood, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent in No. 2, Mise.
[MAJORITY]
The motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus in these cases are severally denied.