Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 1932 — 63 F.2d 1011 · caselaw · US
Corporations
NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
63 F.2d 1011·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 6060.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 13, 1932.
Taplin & Fillius, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon authority of Burnet v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co., 52 F.(2d) 123, 128, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. New York Trust Co., 54 F.(2d) 463, 465, and Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corporation v. Heiner, 56 F.(2d) 1072, 1075, the order of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to the Board to set aside the order dismissing the proceeding and to hear and determine the matters complained of in the. petition.