General
Mary T. Palma, Respondent, v. The Town of North Hempstead, Appellant; Walter W. Hoffman, Respondent v. The Town of North Hempstead, Appellant
168 A.D. 896·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary T. Palma, Respondent, v. The Town of North Hempstead, Appellant. Walter W. Hoffman, Respondent v. The Town of North Hempstead, Appellant.
Appeals from orders of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 15th day of March, 1915, denying motions for a change of the place of trial.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The orders appealed from are affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the motions were prematurely made, without prejudice to a renewal of the motions upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses after issue joined. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. In each case order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses after issue joined.