Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Farrington et al. v. Pink, Superintendent of Insurance of New York, et al., 1937 — 302 U.S. 741 · caselaw · US
General
Farrington et al. v. Pink, Superintendent of Insurance of New York, et al.
302 U.S. 741·Supreme Court of the United States·1937
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 449.
Farrington et al. v. Pink, Superintendent of Insurance of New York, et al.
November 8, 1937.
Messrs. W. Gwynn Gardiner and James M. Earnest for petitioners. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Whitaker, and Messrs. Henry A. Julicher and George F. Foley for respondents Julian, Treasurer of the United States, et al. Messrs. Joseph A. Carey, Ralph P. Dunn, Hubert G. King, Alfred C. Bennett, and Benjamin Potoker for respondent Pink.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.