General
Ruth Goldfinger, Plaintiff, v. Henry L. Doherty, Doing Business, etc., Appellant, and Samuel Goldfinger, Made a Party under Civil Practice Act, Section 193, Subdivision 2, Respondent
244 A.D. 779·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ruth Goldfinger, Plaintiff, v. Henry L. Doherty, Doing Business; etc., Appellant, and Samuel Goldfinger, Made a Party under Civil Practice Act, Section 193, Subdivision 2, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Determination affirmed; with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present —1 Martin, F: J.¡ McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, Jj. [153 Mise. 826.]