Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NORTH AMERICAN OIL CONSOLIDATED, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, 1931 — 51 F.2d 1081 · caselaw · US
Tax
NORTH AMERICAN OIL CONSOLIDATED, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
51 F.2d 1081·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NORTH AMERICAN OIL CONSOLIDATED, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 6599.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 29, 1931.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CÜRIAM.]
PER CÜRIAM.
Upon motion of counsel for respondent, consented to by counsel for petitioner, ordered petition to review of North American Oil Consolidated dismissed; mandate forthwith.