Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DIGNITY HEALTH, et al., applicants, v. Starla ROLLINS., 2016 — 137 S. Ct. 28 · caselaw · US
General
DIGNITY HEALTH, et al., applicants, v. Starla ROLLINS.
137 S. Ct. 28195 L. Ed. 2d 901·Supreme Court of the United States·2016
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DIGNITY HEALTH, et al., applicants,
v.
Starla ROLLINS.
No. 16A241 (16-258).
Supreme Court of the United States
Sept. 21, 2016.
Application for stay presented to Justice KENNEDY and by him referred to the Court is granted pending the disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the issuance of the judgment of this Court.