Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis Sanders, Respondent, v. A. E. Pheubottom, Appellant, 1888 — 108 N.Y. 622 · caselaw · US
General
Louis Sanders, Respondent, v. A. E. Pheubottom, Appellant
108 N.Y. 622·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Sanders, Respondent, v. A. E. Pheubottom, Appellant.
(Argued December 13, 1887;
decided January 17, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made February 11,1887, affirming an order of Special Term, denying a motion to set-aside an assignment of the judgment herein.
James Wright for appellant.
W F. (& F. F. Hughitt for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed