Contracts · MBE-tested

ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. CLEVELAND RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee

45 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1931

Before DENISON, MOORMAN, and HICKS; Circuit Judges.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v. CLEVELAND RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee. No. 5621. Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Jan. 9, 1931. B. D. Holt, of Cleveland, Ohio (Cook, McGowan, Poote, Bushnell & Burgess,, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant. Edwin H. Chaney, of Cleveland, Ohio (Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee. Before DENISON, MOORMAN, and HICKS; Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. No question is involved except the meaning of two clauses of the contract between the parties. Upon review and consideration, we agree with the interpretation given by the trial judge. The judgment is affirmed.