Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. Marcus Stowell, as Supervisor, etc., Respondent, v. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Steuben, Appellant, 1895 — 146 N.Y. 381 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. Marcus Stowell, as Supervisor, etc., Respondent, v. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Steuben, Appellant
146 N.Y. 381·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. Marcus Stowell, as Supervisor, etc., Respondent, v. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Steuben, Appellant.
(Argued April 23, 1895;
decided May 21, 1895.)
Appeal from.order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made October 2, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting an application for a writ of peremptory mandamus.
M. Rumsexy Miller for appellant.
John F. Parhhurst for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Argued and decided with People ex rel. Root v. Board of Supervisors of Steuben County (ante, p. 107).