Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Michael Sinteff, Respondent, v. The People's Building, Loan and Saving Association, Appellant, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 566 · caselaw · US
General
Michael Sinteff, Respondent, v. The People's Building, Loan and Saving Association, Appellant
159 N.Y. 566·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael Sinteff, Respondent, v. The People’s Building, Loan and Saving Association, Appellant.
Reported below, 37 App. Div. 340.
(Argued June 5, 1899;
decided June 13, 1899.)
Motion to place on the calendar an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered February 18, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on a trial without a jury.
The motion was made upon the ground that the delay of the appellant in perfecting his appeal has prevented it from being on the present calendar.
MoEwan ds MoEwan for motion.
G. M. Elliott opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, without costs.