General
Mark v. Wisconsin
308 U.S. 520·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 508.
Mark v. Wisconsin.
December 4, 1939.
Ralph Mark, pro se. Mr. Harold H. Persons, Assistant Attorney General of Wisconsin, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file the motion to dismiss the appeal' is granted. The motion to dismiss is also granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516; Bolln v. Nebraska, 176 U. S. 83; Lem Woon v. Oregon, 229 U. S. 586. The motion for- leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.