Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ellen Reardon, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. The New York Consolidated Card Company, Respondent, 1887 — 105 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
Ellen Reardon, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. The New York Consolidated Card Company, Respondent
105 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ellen Reardon, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. The New York Consolidated Card Company, Respondent.
(Argued March 22, 1887,
decided April 19, 1887)
John D. Townsend for appellant.
George Zabriskie for respondent
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.