Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Perth Amboy Mutual Loan, Homestead and Building Association, Respondent, v. Henry T. Chapman, Appellant, 1904 — 178 N.Y. 558 · caselaw · US
General
The Perth Amboy Mutual Loan, Homestead and Building Association, Respondent, v. Henry T. Chapman, Appellant
178 N.Y. 558·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Perth Amboy Mutual Loan, Homestead and Building Association, Respondent, v. Henry T. Chapman, Appellant.
Perth Amboy Mut. Loan, etc., Assn. v. Chapman, 80 App. Div. 556, affirmed.
(Argued February 29, 1904;
decided March 15, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment entered March 19, 1903, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, overruling defendant’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment for the plaintiff on the verdict.
Clarence F. Birdseye for appellant.
Edward S. Sa/oage for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Cullen, JJ. Absent: Parker, Ch. J., and Werner, J.