Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Michael Kiley, 1912 — 226 U.S. 621 · caselaw · US
General
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Michael Kiley
226 U.S. 621·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 114.
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Michael Kiley.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin.
December 19, 1912.
Mr. Burton Hanson and Mr. C. H. Van Alstine for the plaintiff, in error:
No appearance for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule.