Torts · MBE-tested
Isidor Lang, Respondent, v. Hudson and Manhattan Railroad Company, Appellant
171 A.D. 898·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isidor Lang, Respondent, v. Hudson and Manhattan Railroad Company, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Term, entered in the New York county clerk’s office, affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
There is no evidence to sustain the finding that the defendant was guilty of negligence, and such finding is reversed. The determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment of the Municipal Court are reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Determination and judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.