Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HUNTINGTON DEVELOPMENT & GAS COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Allie STEWART, Appellee, 1931 — 46 F.2d 462 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
HUNTINGTON DEVELOPMENT & GAS COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Allie STEWART, Appellee
46 F.2d 462·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HUNTINGTON DEVELOPMENT & GAS COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Allie STEWART, Appellee.
No. 2980.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Jan. 13, 1931.
For former opinion, see 44 F.(2d) 119.
W. C. ‘W. Rehshaw, of Huntington, W. Va; (Harold-A. Ritz, of Charleston, W.'.Va., on the brief), for appellant.
W. T. Lovins, of Huntington, W. Va., for appellee.
Before NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judge, and GRONER and ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the petition for rehearihg in this case, the court is of the opinion that the matters raised in the petition were fully and carefully considered in the majority opinion of this court, and also discussed in the minority opinion by Judge Ernest F. Cochran, and that no new points are raised on the petition for rehearing. The rehearing is therefore denied.