Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anna Freemont, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Freemont, Deceased, Respondent, v. Boston and Maine Railroad et al., Appellants, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 571 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Anna Freemont, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Freemont, Deceased, Respondent, v. Boston and Maine Railroad et al., Appellants
187 N.Y. 571·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anna Freemont, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Freemont, Deceased, Respondent, v. Boston and Maine Railroad et al., Appellants.
Freemont v. Boston & Maine R. R. Co., 111 App. Div. 831, affirmed.
(Argued January 28, 1907;
decided February 19, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 12, 1906, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and. an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been caused by defendants’ negligence.
Lewis E. Carr and Jarvis P. O'Brien for appellants.
George B. Wellington for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs-; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.