Admiralty
THE ECLIPSE. ANDERSON et al. v. MARTIAL et al.
60 F. 105·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1893
Before McKENNA and HILBERT, Circuit Judges, and HAW-LEY, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
THE ECLIPSE. ANDERSON et al. v. MARTIAL et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 17, 1893.)
No. 100.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
In Admiralty. Libel by Thomas Martial and others against the ship Eclipse (Andrew Anderson and others, claimants) for "balance of seamen’s wages. Decree for libelants. 53 Fed. 273. Claimants appeal.
Affirmed.
S. Bloom, for appellants.
H. W. Hutton, for appellees.
Before McKENNA and HILBERT, Circuit Judges, and HAW-LEY, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — McKENNA, Circuit Judge.]
McKENNA, Circuit Judge.
The facts of this case are fully and clearly stated in the opinion of the learned judge of the lower court, (reported in 53 Fed. 273). In his reasoning and conclusions we concur, and therefore adopt his opinion as the opinion of this court.
The decree of the district court is affirmed.