Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick Wagner, Appellant, v. John H. Perry, Respondent, 1888 — 110 N.Y. 676 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick Wagner, Appellant, v. John H. Perry, Respondent
110 N.Y. 676·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick Wagner, Appellant, v. John H. Perry, Respondent.
(Submitted October 16, 1888;
decided October 26, 1888.)
Motion to dismiss appeal from judgment of the Generar Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made at the February Term, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon the report of a referee.
James R. Marvin for motion.
Charles Miehling opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.